Decide with receipts
Research Field Guide
A decision-ready dossier with primary sources, contradictions, and a recommended path.
Inspect scope and checksKiren Srinivasan’s independent practice
Fixed-scope research, reliable agent workflows, and interface systems for founders who need a concrete result this month. You get the artifact, the checks, and the manual. No retainer required.
Wild output.
Manual discipline.
Draft first.
Verify before release.
Start small
Three public offers
Each offer names the finished artifact, starting price, delivery target, exclusions, and the checks that define done.
Compare every scopeDecide with receipts
A decision-ready dossier with primary sources, contradictions, and a recommended path.
Inspect scope and checksMake one path reliable
One unreliable workflow turned into a tested agent-assisted path with permissions, recovery, and a runbook.
Inspect scope and checksSettle the system
A coherent token system and the priority surfaces needed to ship it across devices.
Inspect scope and checksHuman-native and agent-readable
People get a normal interface. Approved agents get documented access when it helps. Both follow the same scope, permissions, price, and review steps.
The manual
The manifest
Selected public work
No invented client outcomes. Each story shows what exists, how it can be checked, and what was not measured.
See every proof recordPublic repository, versioned release
An open-source web research CLI that routes focused capabilities through a deterministic task graph.
Visible proof: Public source and release history.
Inspect the recordPublic repository, validation workflow present
A portable Agent Skills package that converts visual evidence into a validated design-system contract.
Visible proof: Portable skill package structure.
Inspect the recordPublic repository, validators documented
Public, reusable agent building blocks with explicit sanitization, identity-neutrality, and safety checks.
Visible proof: Dry-run installation path.
Inspect the recordThe working method
The process is written so the buyer can see where scope, access, judgment, and release change hands.
Read the full methodYou should know the finish line before I touch the work. We name the file, screen, decision, or working path that must exist at handoff.
I inspect the actual sources and permissions before asking for more access. That is where constraints and failure cases usually surface.
I build the smallest version that answers the question or makes the path work. Protocols and polish wait until they earn their place.
Then I try the obvious breakpoints: bad input, a rejection, an interruption, and a repeat request. The agreed checks decide whether it is ready.
You get the artifact, its source, the checks I ran, the limits I found, and a manual someone else can follow.
One accountable operator
AI can help me reach a strong first pass faster. I still decide what is in scope, what evidence counts, where access stops, and whether the work is ready to release. The files and manual must stand on their own after the model session is gone.
AI helps with production. Kiren makes the final call on scope, evidence, exceptions, and release.